LTED 667 Suzanne Graybush Blog Post #3
Now we are at this critical point, where we do not give homework, give too many chances, and the bar is set too low. The administrators hardly back us as teachers, and bend towards the parents. The only ones who seem to be held accountable are US as teachers.
What does this mean for literacy? It is terrible, the students do not take initiative to read at home, so I try to provide time in class, but it isn't enough. We need help, we need administrators who are tough, we need remediation.
As far as the reading Pre-Assessments given at the beginning of the school year, I have many below average readers. About 1/3 of my students are below grade level reading level. I currently teach 3 blocks of ELA equalling about 55 students. Out of these 55 students only about 25 are on grade level. Ten students are on the 7th grade level while the rest range from grades 3 through 6. This is a town where most parents are college educated and homes range from 500000 to in the millions. Sometimes I shake my head in disbelief, this should not be. Honestly this is one of the main reasons I am here enrolled in this course and many others, to help these students become better readers. To hopefully one day lead this school into literacy and academic success.
In our district we are kind of on our own. Supervisors have come and gone over the years, one year here, another two here, sometimes our Vice Principal who never taught ELA is our supervisor, other times it's a Social Studies Supervisor. And over the 20 years I'd say for ten of them we have been completely on our own. This year we have a 6-12 supervisor who is trying to remediate the system. We only really meet with our 8th grade ELA teachers to discuss our curriculum each day and once a month with Social Studies and ELA teachers of all grades. I feel like literacy has been lost in the shuffle in our district.
For a very brief time we did have a literacy coach, possibly a year, but I feel her responsibility was to collect and sort data on students for implementation, whereas in the text coaches are defined as, "In many schools literacy coaches and reading specialists are synonymous terms--the reading specialist ISthe literacy coach. With so many of the same jobs being performed by reading specialists and literacy coaches, it is even more important for today's reading specialist to have a clearly defined, written job description that is disseminated to teachers standings about what reading specialists "do all day" can be resolved by completing this extremely important task (p. 46)." This is interesting information because I have heard this around, but our specialist doesn't model lessons, just keeps running records and works specifically with "lower level" students in an RTI class who need the extra help.
We use various programs like I ready where we are required to use 45 class minutes a week practicing on it, which is supposed to help move our students up through the levels they
are behind. We have not been trained on the system as of yet and we have had it for two
years. We have Lucy Calkin's books, but again I have had one or two trainings on Reader's
and Writer's workshop in all of my 21 years of teaching. We use a RTI approach with a few identifying students who need remediation. Our school does offer Wilson reading and a few Read 180 classes, but in very small groups.
I do my best and try to implement all of the practices I have learned in order to help these students grow as readers and writers the best that I can.
Upon reading our text book I came across something that could help my district and others like it, "Creating the comprehensive two-year literacy improvement plan/grid is a written document. It
incorporates the components previously developed, including school and district demographics, a list of literacy team members, a description of current practices, a summary of the findings from the needs assessment, and a proposal for professional development," (p. 99). Our school would benefit from this type of structure for reform, so I will keep this handy to one day implement it as part of our literacy team.
My literacy "dream team" would be made up of one representative from each grade and subject level. This is important in order to see literacy from a Math perspective, Social Studies, Science, and even Art or Health classes. I am sure the content area teachers notice the inability of students to be able to read the various texts in their classes.
Our Vice Principal, English supervisor, and reading specialist should be chief leaders of this group in order to gain support and clearance on certain needs to be assessed and implemented quicker. I would love to enlist the help of a technology teacher too, in order to know what programs may be more efficient in aiding our students grow as readers and writers.
Suzanne,
ReplyDeleteMany of the points you have touched upon resonate with my current teaching experience. In particular, the one where you write about the limited and insufficient training experiences you have had. In my own district, we have made amazing gains in regards to implementing technology and purchasing programs for students. Within the past 5 years, we have made Chromebook-student ratios 1:1 as well as purchased a new Science, Social Studies, Math, and Literacy programs. On top of that the district has bought supplemental programs like Achieve 3000, IXL, and Book Creator for ELA. Yet, the consistency of teacher training and support is subpar. If teacher training and knowledge is crucial towards implementing programs, I don't understand why there isn't sufficient follow-through. I have had 2 trainings on Mc-Graw Hill Wonders and they both turned out not to address Special Education Learners. They have a plethora of resources but leave the burden on the teacher to pick and choose. This is dangerous because where is the uniformity in instruction. Also, what if teachers pick what they are more comfortable in as opposed as to what is essential and is back up by evidence-based research.
On a brighter notes, I love that your Literacy Dream Team is inclusive of content area teachers and special teachers. Literacy is occurring across subjects and those teachers have the same challenges as ELA teachers in regards t vocabulary acquisition, writing production, and overall reading comprehension.